Under Construction
Country Sector Sovereign / Non-Sovereign Title Commitment in UA Status Signature Date
Multinational Power Sovereign Multinational - Nigeria-Niger-Benin-Burkina Faso Power Interconnection Project 36,500,000 Implementation
Djibouti Power Sovereign Djibouti – Geothermal Exploration Project in the Lake Assal Region 10,740,000 Implementation
Multinational Power Sovereign Multinational - Projet d’interconnexion électrique Cameroun- Tchad (composante Tchad) 27,500,000 Implementation
Madagascar Power Sovereign Madagascar - Etude de faisabilité du projet de renforcement et d'interconnexion des réseaux de transport d'énergie électrique 1,000,000 Implementation
Multinational Power Sovereign Multinational - 225KV Guinea-Mali Electricity Interconnection Project 30,000,000 Implementation
Multinational Power Sovereign Multinational - 225KV Guinea-Mali Electricity Interconnection Project 30,000,000 Implementation
Mali Power Sovereign Mali - Mini Hydropower Plants and Related Distribution Networks Development Project (PDM-Hydro) 20,000,000 Implementation

BLOG

19 Dec 2021

Reframing Climate Justice for Development Six principles for supporting inclusive and equitable energy transitions in low-emitting energy-poor African countries

Tags
Report originally posted on https://www.energyforgrowth.org/report/reframing-climate-justice-for-development/
Author
Mimi Alemayehou, Katie Auth, Murefu Barasa, Morgan Bazilian, Brad Handler, Uzo Iweala, Todd Moss, Rose Mutiso, Zainab Usman (Energy for Growth Hub)
Climate Justice

Advancing inclusive and equitable energy transitions is one of this century’s most vital global
challenges, and one in which development finance will play a crucial role. References to justice
and equity are widespread in international climate policy, and are increasingly being used by
development organizations to guide their own work, including support for energy transitions.
But prevailing definitions of climate justice rarely fully capture the priorities, challenges and
perspectives of low-emitting energy-poor countries, the vast majority of which are in
sub-Saharan Africa. When applied to development policy, this gap risks prioritizing near-term
emissions reductions over broader support for economic development and energy
transformation, with comparatively little climate benefit. This could severely hinder poverty
alleviation, development, and climate resilience — the very opposite of justice. We need energy
transitions that are truly ‘just and inclusive.’1 What does this mean for development funders
and financiers, and how should it drive their approach to supporting energy transitions in the
lowest-income countries?

Why do we need to reframe climate justice for development?
1. Because low-emitting energy-poor countries face unique challenges: Since they are
energy-poor, they produce extremely low emissions per capita. Power is often too
unreliable and expensive to enable job creation. These countries have contributed very
little to climate change, but are among the most vulnerable to its impacts.

2. Because prevailing definitions of climate justice rarely address energy poverty:
Terms like ‘environmental justice,’ ‘climate justice,’ the ‘just transition,’ and ‘common
but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities’ are important and
valuable. But few of them address energy poverty explicitly or fully account for the
ambitions of low-emitting energy-poor countries.

3. Because climate justice must achieve just and equitable energy outcomes: In
addition to decarbonization, energy transitions in low-emitting energy-poor countries
must: [1] provide universal electricity access; [2] power job creation and economic
diversification; [3] enhance climate resilience; and [4] set the stage for a prosperous
low-carbon future.

We propose six basic principles to help development funders support inclusive and equitable
energy transitions in the poorest countries:

1. Diversity: Adopt flexible policies and country-specific approaches.

2. Agency: Prioritize African-owned ambitions and plans, and align external support.

3. Ambition: Aim much higher than universal household access.

4. Resilience: Prioritize energy solutions for climate adaptation.

5. Innovation: Invest in emerging solutions, but beware of naive ‘leapfrogging.’

6. Equity: Treat the remaining global carbon budget as a ‘development budget.’
Climate policy must reflect and respond to the needs and ambitions of those most impacted,
and integrate a wider variety of perspectives on the meaning of justice and fairness.

These six principles will help chart a pathway for development funders to better support low-emitting
energy-poor countries — and help secure the dignity and opportunity of billions currently shut
out of international climate decision-making
 

Add new comment